Five techniques to know who took your fate.

Five techniques to know who took your fate. 

Jawas Mohammed Message:

Currently, one of the issues that are being heard by the public is the campaign to demolish houses and other property in the name of "corridor development". Is the so-called corridor development really development? Is beautifying the city a priority at the moment? Leaving aside the question for the moment, let's look at the legality of the process. 

 The government can demolish privately owned property for two reasons.

a) If the building is constructed illegally.

This means that if the owner builds the building without having a legal certificate of possession on the land, or if he does not meet the legal provisions and regulations required to build the building, the government can take corrective action up to the point of demolishing the building. The forsaking that is now going on in the name of corridor development is not aimed at the previously illegally constructed buildings. Most of the victims are providing information that they built on their legal property, following the legal procedures in force at the time. The government did not deny this.  

b) If the government wants the land for public infrastructure (eminent domain).  

If privately owned land is needed to build infrastructure such as schools, roads and hospitals, the government can take it. In this case, the government is obliged to give the owner a reasonable compensation for the land and the property built on it. But this corridor is not being built for infrastructure development. Even if it is said to be for road widening, the necessary property compensation is not being paid to those who will be destroyed. Worse, the victims were not even given time to pick up and relocate their belongings. In fact, people are forced to demolish their property at their own expense.

Therefore, this so-called corridor development is more than just scaring the city for a season, and it does not contribute to economic growth. It is a property destruction campaign without any legal process. Let's say that he is going to surprise visitors by decorating the streets of the capital. What is the point of demolishing the houses lined up on the side of the main road in small rural markets, apart from destroying the only commercial activity in the neighborhood? 

And why is the government carrying out this campaign that weighs the benefits against the harm? The answer is short. This is not a government scheme but a personal campaign of the Prime Minister. He wants to think that the country is growing by using projects that are eye-catching but have little developmental value, as he has no ideas, policies and plans that can bring about real economic growth. If you want an example of this, if you go 50 meters from the dimly lit streets, you will find unemployment and poverty worse than ever, and the residents suffering. No, I am ready to listen to anyone who says that this campaign is beneficial for the development and growth of the country and follows legal procedures.